Will the right to hold an opinion win the battle against pervasive surveillance? Thumbnail
‹ Back
Privacy 12 June 2015

Will the right to hold an opinion win the battle against pervasive surveillance?

Christine Runnegar
By Christine RunnegarSenior Director, Internet Trust

There are many messages to take away from UN Special Rapporteur David Kaye’s report on encryption and anonymity, but one that gave me an “aha!” moment was his analysis of human rights law on the right to hold opinions without interference. Specifically, it was his observation that the limitations and restrictions on the right to freedom of expression in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) do not apply to the right to hold opinions, and that “… the mechanics of holding opinions have evolved …” such that “… holding opinions in the digital age is not an abstract concept limited to what may be in one’s mind”. For example, individuals’ views may be saved in browsing histories, email archives, etc.

David Kaye also highlights that the right to hold opinions extends to the right to form opinions. He expresses the view that mass and targeted surveillance systems “may undermine the right to form an opinion, as the fear of unwilling disclosure of online activity … likely deters individuals from accessing information, particularly where such surveillance leads to repressive outcomes”.

So far, the primary champion against pervasive surveillance has been the right to privacy, but unlike the right to hold an opinion without interference, the right to privacy is more vulnerable to interference, especially where matters of national interest are concerned. Such interference is confined by various requirements, e.g. must not be unlawful, must not be arbitrary, must be proportionate …, but, as we have previously observed, those international law requirements did not protect Internet users from pervasive surveillance.

Therefore, it may be time to complement ongoing efforts in the privacy space with closer scrutiny of the implications of online surveillance on individuals’ enjoyment of their right to form and to hold opinions on the Internet. Perhaps, the right to hold opinions can constrain what privacy cannot.


See also:


Photo credit: Yuri Arcurs on iStockPhoto

‹ Back

Disclaimer: Viewpoints expressed in this post are those of the author and may or may not reflect official Internet Society positions.

Related articles

10 March 2021

Internet Society Joins Leading Internet Advocates to Call on ISPs to Commit to Basic User Privacy Protections

Mozilla, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the Internet Society call on AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon to commit to limiting...

Strengthening the Internet 22 February 2021

The Best and the Brightest Security and Privacy Experts Are Gathering Virtually at NDSS 2021

The 28th consecutive Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS 2021) kicks off today. NDSS is a premier academic...

Building Trust 28 January 2020

This Data Privacy Day It’s the Little Things That Count

Today we’re celebrating Data Privacy Day, which is all about empowering people and organizations to respect privacy, safeguard data,...

Join the conversation with Internet Society members around the world