Donate
UN Members Strengthen Their Position on Surveillance Thumbnail
‹ Back
Identity 5 December 2014

UN Members Strengthen Their Position on Surveillance

Christine Runnegar
By Christine RunnegarSenior Director, Internet Trust

On 18 December 2013, the UN General Assembly adopted resolution 68/167 on the right to privacy in the digital age [1], sending a clear message to the international community that the right to privacy applies online as well as offline.

Recently, the Third Committee adopted a second resolution on the right to privacy in the digital age [2] brought to the UN by Brazil and Germany and sponsored by the countries illustrated in the map.


Map produced using http://www.amcharts.com

The resolution emphasizes that unlawful or arbitrary surveillance or interception of communications violates the right to privacy. Significantly, the resolution also formally recognises that metadata can have a privacy impact, and that even the mere collection of data can violate the right to privacy.

There is a call to member states to take measures to stop and prevent surveillance-related privacy violations, echoing the call in the 2013 resolution. The 2014 resolution also goes a step further and calls for member states to offer individuals whose privacy rights have been violated by unlawful or arbitrary surveillance with access to an effective remedy, consistent with international human rights obligations.

Now that the position of the supporting member states has been made clear in these resolutions, it is important to consider what those principles mean in practice. In this regard, the Internet Society strongly supports the significant progress that has been made in the UN on the issue of pervasive surveillance, but calls upon member states, in partnership with all stakeholders, to articulate what is (or is not) unlawful or arbitrary surveillance – to consider the practical meaning of conditions such as “necessary”, “proportionate” and “not arbitrary” in that context

For the Internet Society, the key criterion here is legitimacy. To be legitimate, a surveillance policy must not only be legal: it must also be demonstrably necessary, proportionate and fair. Since “fairness” is a subjective quality, demonstrating fairness relies on other factors which the Internet Society has consistently championed: transparency, accountability, and appropriate representation of the rights and interests of all stakeholders.

We also believe there should be open debate on how to protect Internet users from unlawful or arbitrary surveillance.

[1] United Nations General Assembly: Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 18 December 2013
[2] United Nations General Assembly: The right to privacy in the digital age

‹ Back

Disclaimer: Viewpoints expressed in this post are those of the author and may or may not reflect official Internet Society positions.

Related articles

Surveillance: Is this the beginning of the end of data trawlers?
Privacy21 December 2014

Surveillance: Is this the beginning of the end of data trawlers?

Last 21 December, we published a post entitled When Law Isn’t Enough [1]. with a hope that 2014 would be...

UNHRC Creates New UN Special Rapporteur on “The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age”
UNHRC Creates New UN Special Rapporteur on “The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age”
Human Rights26 March 2015

UNHRC Creates New UN Special Rapporteur on “The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age”

Many of you might be interested to know that the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva has just adopted the...

Pervasive Internet Surveillance - Policy ripples
Pervasive Internet Surveillance - Policy ripples
Improving Technical Security26 June 2014

Pervasive Internet Surveillance – Policy ripples

It has become clear in the past year that pervasive surveillance is a threat to all users of the Internet...

Join the conversation with Internet Society members around the world