‹ Back
Deploy360 10 September 2014

Any Ideas For A Better Color Scheme For Our DNSSEC Deployment Maps?

Dan York
By Dan YorkDirector, Online Content

Do any of you have any suggestions for a better palette of colors for us to use for our DNSSEC deployment maps?  We generate them every Monday morning and send them out to a public mailing list (to which any of you are welcome to subscribe).  Here is a recent global view (click/tap to see larger image):

2014-09-02-2014-09-02

My issue (and maybe this is just me) is that I’m not entirely fond of the colors used in the “early” stages of a TLD’s deployment.  As we note on the deployment maps page, we track a TLD through five stages of DNSSEC deployment:

  • Experimental – Internal experimentation announced or observed
  • Announced – Public commitment to deploy
  • Partial – Zone is signed but not in operation (no DS in root)
  • DS in Root – Zone is signed and its DS has been published
  • Operational – Accepting signed delegations and DS in root

The most important states are the final two when DNSSEC for the TLD is “working”.  I like the existing green colors for those two states, although the “DS in Root” green is perhaps a bit brighter than I would want.  The point is that we want to use green to show the “good” states of DNSSEC deployment – and over time we’d like to see the whole map go to that darker shade of green.

It is the first three states that bother me a bit.  There is a progression between those three states as it often goes like this:

  • Someone from a TLD says at a conference or on a mailing list that they are experimenting with DNSSEC.  We can then flag them as “Experimental”.
  • Perhaps next someone from that TLD issues a formal statement, publishes a blog post or these days sends out a tweet or posts another social media update saying that they are going to deploy DNSSEC.  We can then flag them as “Announced”.
  • Then at some point the TLD’s zone is actually signed with DNSSEC, but the DS key hasn’t been uploaded to the root.  Now we can put them as “Partial” in the database.

In my ideal world I’d have some color progression that shows the movement along this path.  The orange, yellow and blue we currently use don’t really show a progression.   I’ve tried using different shades of yellow or orange but you also want it to be easy to determine what state a given TLD is in – and for that the current set of colors does work.

Anyway… if anyone has ideas I’d be open to hearing them.  The software we’re using can set the colors to be any of the typical hex-encoded colors used in web pages.  It can’t do shading or lines or anything like that, just colors.

Please feel free to leave suggestions here – or contact me directly at [email protected].  Thanks!

P.S. And if you would like to help get more domains signed with DNSSEC, please see our “Start Here” page to find resources targeted at your type of organization!

‹ Back

Disclaimer: Viewpoints expressed in this post are those of the author and may or may not reflect official Internet Society positions.

Related articles

Improving Technical Security 15 March 2019

DNS Privacy Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

We previously posted about how the DNS does not inherently employ any mechanisms to provide confidentiality for DNS transactions,...

Improving Technical Security 14 March 2019

Introduction to DNS Privacy

Almost every time we use an Internet application, it starts with a DNS (Domain Name System) transaction to map...

Improving Technical Security 13 March 2019

IPv6 Security for IPv4 Engineers

It is often argued that IPv4 practices should be forgotten when deploying IPv6, as after all IPv6 is a...

Join the conversation with Internet Society members around the world